There is life with HIV

Oral sex Pass HIV? Yes! You can pass! But…

But I had an interesting case in which this did not happen! But chicken broth and caltela do no harm to anyone

Image JamesDeMers by Pixabay

Oral sex Pass HIV? The question arises here every day, through all available means

It is an important part of sexual intercourse, but it is NOT PRELIMINARY

Seriously, oral sex can also transmit HIV. But there was only one case of HIV transmission through oral sex and, unfortunately, the source of the news is not giving me the result of the search.

In this case there was HIV transmission through oral sex Oral sex passes HIV!

But it was a very striking case.

It dealt with the relationship between two women, one of whom, and maybe you are a little scared by “my knowledge in the area”, but I was a DJ at SKY Perepepês, how I miss you! It was a GLS house and life was simpler.

Oral Sex Is Not Preliminary And May Pass HIV

It's something important between two people

Praticar sexo oral em mulheres é bem complicado... se você leva em conta os riscosIt takes responsibility for that. And I remember that, I'm not quite sure, but there was a joke or mockery with the extremely long acronym created by people who don't want to, I know they don't want to be labeled, and they shouldn't be.

Oral Sex Is Good, But The Doubts, I See Here, Are Painful

Are there any chances of contracting HIV in anal sex or HIV in oral sex? This is probably one of the most common questions asked by healthcare providers and doctors about AIDS.

People really want to know something about their personal risk in relation to their sex life itself and what the real possibilities of contracting HIV during fellatio - even more so than during anal sex!

For everyone knows that this is, regardless of whether it is a heterosexual or homosexual relationship, and certainly also for bisexual people, the biggest pinch of risk, anal sex.

Good and Painful, for many, anal sex will always represent the greatest risk

then Straub


And in oral sex there is a painful doubt.

The United States Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has a page that describes the likelihood of transmission through oral sex as "low" or small (...). But what does that mean? The website https://www.aids.gov coloca thus:

"You can contract HIV by performing oral sex on your male partner, although the risk does not pose as much risk as it is with unprotected anal or vaginal sex." As for the risk in a woman, the website explains: "HIV has been found in vaginal discharge, so there is a risk of contracting HIV through this route."

The younger ones forgive me, but I try to clarify them!

Oral sex is Sex! It is not preliminary!

But use predictions and statistics? Well, I did something like that, I “went in faith” to get lucky, and that was it. If you catch, you caught! I say this clearly here, in HIV Cure, reminding EVERYONE that it is my personal position, my view of what HIV infection and AIDS mean to me, within my life, and I speak of life as “ aesthetic entity ”as Rubem Alves described it well.

And I speak of life as an “aesthetic entity” as Rubem Alves described it well!

Out of this world, in this lifetime, I'm fed up!

And here I am in pain, drugged with methadone, amitril and gabapentin, tried to draw your attention to the risk, the great risk of contracting HIV.

Oral Sex and HIV: The Immunological Window is the Same - See Here

Statistically it is more difficult to contract HIV during oral sex.

It would hardly be like this ... Measure your risk of contracting HIV in anal or vaginal or oral sex in numbers ...

Life is not a mathematical thing, life is an aesthetic entity.

That is why many of us try to avoid percentages and proportions when it comes to risk.

I don't think it's wise for you to manage risk for pleasure. Not worth it!

But one thing is true. It is more difficult to contract HIV in oral sex, and it is much more dangerous to contract HIV in anal sex! And many of those who trivialize AIDS, similar to the link, or mine, end up in contagion

Probabilities of HIV transmission due to exposure to the virus are usually expressed in percentages or as prognoses (something that should be used when calculating your chances of being “lucky” in the mega turn of the turn and not in the search for the possibility of contracting HIV through oral sex !.

For example, the average risk of contracting HIV through sharing a needle once with an HIV positive drug user is 0,67%, which can also be indicated as 1 in 149, using what CDC prefers, 67 10.000 exposures .

Risk Management, Oral Sex, HIV and AIDS

I read somewhere that people need to evaluate what they like to live, experience and do. And in this way, establish for yourself how much risk you are willing to take.

This is called risk management, if we change into kids and I understand the desire. I even understand any personal motivations for doing so. But…

What I assure you is the following. Risk management is very good as long as managing works well for you!

But when, as I say, the shuttlecock falls…. Boy… Girl…. The shuttlecock on the floor is disconcerting and painful. Because if you don't reach it, it goes straight to the ground. And if you fall in the mud. It's the mud ...

For although it seems so remote, it still happens, and this very small number becomes a reality, something that, mathematically and statistically represents, in the cumulative results, as “100%” despite having been so little related !!!

For even if the risk of contracting HIV during vaginal penetration for a woman in the United States is 1 per 1.250 exposures (or 0,08%) the risk exists and there is no “watermark” that makes you think .

For men, the scenario is 1 per 2.500 exposures, literally half of the risks taken by women in a similar situation (0,04%, which is the same as performing fellatio).

It is difficult but you can get HIV in Oral Sex! But not impossible

And if an HIV negative person plays the passive role for someone HIV positive in the active role who doesn't use any kind of protection, but without ejaculating inside (withdrawal), the chances of HIV transmission are on average less than 2 percent. Specifically, it is 1,43%, or 1 out of 70. If the penetrating boy uses withdrawal (removing the penis before ejaculation), then the chances are 1 to 154.

Sexuality, sex and statistics combine with advanced algebra: (a + b2) 2 = ???

How can we go from the prognoses, being 1 between 70, that HIV will be transmitted during intercourse with relationships whose most risky prognoses with possibilities of 1 for 2 will be with young gay men in the United States who will contract HIV before they complete 50 years (and even before you think: No, the answer is not that people with HIV are "vagabond and promiscuous" people, or have never heard of safer sex).

Beginners, have to understand that these probabilities of HIV transmission by single exposure are averages. They are general figures that do not reflect the many factors that can increase or reduce the risks.

Risk Management, a complicated thing

One of these factors is acute infection, the period of six to twelve weeks after contracting the virus. At this point, viral load rises immensely, increasing a person's infectiousness by up to 26 times!

And that is why you should think carefully and use a condom, because this article on risks and “deadlines for becoming infectious” is one of the most read on this blog! So close to that, the risk of vaginal delivery transmission jumps from 1 in 1.250 exposures to 1 in 50 exposures and the risk of receptive anal sex goes from 1 to 70 to greater than 1 to 3.

It is also important to realize that during acute infection, the immune system has not yet created antibodies that lower viral load, at least for a few years. HIV tests that depend on antibodies can give a false negative reading during acute infection, also known as the "immune window" period.

Another Sexually Transmitted Infection

The presence of another sexually transmitted disease, STD or STI, as preferred by preciosists and euphemists on duty, those who understand that “disease is ugly” and that “infectious is the politically correct! Euphemisms do not cooperate. Do not add before the simple!

Let them go with the six hundred thousand devils !!! - even without symptoms, such as gonorrhea in the throat or rectum - can increase the risk of contracting HIV about eight times, in part because STDs increase inflammation and thus the number of white blood cells that are the targets of HIV. Vaginal conditions like bacterial vaginosis, dryness and menstruation also altered the risk.

There are quite sure these numbers. But they can be a good tool for understanding risk.

In times of AIDS, Zika and Gonorrhea hyper resistant antibiotics without sex condoms is like playing with your life on a roulette in a casino and betting on thirteen black ...

One hour you win!

Other factors that reduce the risk of contagion in oral, anal and vaginal sex:

Circumcision makes an average reduction of sixty percent for heterosexual men. HIV-positive people who have an undetectable viral load thanks to their ART can reduce the risk of transmission by 96 percent, a concept known as “treatment as prevention” (TasP).

The first results of the Partner study (to be completed in 2017 - already completed) found no transmission between both types of heterosexual relationships and serodiscordant gay couples when the positive partner was successful in treatment, even in cases where other STDs were present.

HIV-negative people can take a Truvada pill daily as pre-exposure prophylaxis or PrEP, to reduce their risk by up to 92%; likewise, there is post-exposure prophylaxis or PEP. And the CDC says that condoms reduce risk by about 80 percent. Evidently, these figures vary based on the correct and consistent use of the prevention strategy.

Editor's note. For three decades the condom was considered to be effective 100%, and now there seems to be a "niche market" that reduces the capacity of protection by condom (condoms) to 80%.

The Matrix in Oral Sex Statistics

Researchers also display risk through constructs * of family, relationships, community and socioeconomic status. A quick example: according to CDC data, 84% of HIV positive women contracted the virus through heterosexual contact.

–Construct designates, in science, an unobservable theoretical concept. Examples of constructs are personality, love, fear. Such concepts are used in common language, but in order to become a scientific construct, they need a clear definition and an empirical basis.

As researchers including Judith Auerbach, PhD, Adjunct Professor at the University of California at San Francisco, the phrase “heterosexual contact” masks the prevalence of anal sex among heterosexual couples and the role of sexual violence - which may be important because exposure to inequality between sexes and violence in intimate relationships triples a woman's risk of contracting STDs and increases her chance of contracting HIV 1,5 times.

The Accumulated Risk

And then there is the concept of cumulative risk. The figures often cited for the risk of HIV transmission take into account an instance of exposure. I may have contracted from 20 different people without, I started to think!

But this is not statistical data. Risk accumulates through repeated exposures, but you can not simply add up the probabilities of each exposure to full risk score.

Statisticians, if you're curious, have a formula for cumulative risk: 1 - ((1 - x) ^ y) where x is the exposure risk (as a decimal) and y is the number of exposures.

Well, many of us will not be able to tabulate a restaurant bill, so it's unlikely that algebra is debated during a meal. But not even the world's largest statistician would be wise enough to assess risk based on HIV statistics.

Statistically Infected ...

This is a seriously dangerous game. Numbers and probabilities can be calculated and misinterpreted.

Case in point: Having a 1 in 70 chance of HIV transmission does not mean that it takes 70 exposures to the virus to seroconvert. This simply means that out of 70 exposures, on average, one will lead to HIV; Chance can result in transmission occurring in the first exposure, as is the famous Case of Vaéria Polizzi in the book after that trip.

Another important concept to be understood is absolute risk (what is effectively risk) versus relative risk (the percentage change in risk). Phrases like "PrEP can reduce your risk by 92 percent" tells us about relative risks, but most people want to know the absolute risks.

Risk reduction is math! Are you still, after reading this text so far, willing to take chances?

In this example, 92 percent risk reduction does not mean that the final absolute risk is 8%. Instead, it is an 92 percent risk reduction onset. If the absolute risk start is 50%, then PrEP reduces the risk of 4%; If the scratch start is 20%, then PrEP goes down to 1,6%.

Armed with data like this, it is tempting to try to calculate your HIV risk for specific scenarios and then plan accordingly.

For example, what are the chances of HIV for someone with an acute infection if you are on PrEP? Such exercises can be problematic, warns James Wilton of the Canadian AIDS Information Exchange (CATIE), which specializes in the biology of HIV transmission and its implications for communicating HIV risk.

In real life, because of all the variables involved - from a person's HIV viral load in the community and the prevalence of onset and (therefore) ultimate risks for each individual are very difficult to identify. Me, Cláudio: HOW MUCH I HAVE ESCAPED HERE I AM!

"The numbers you come across are not definitive," he notes. There are also often research gaps, he says, which means that in many cases, scientists may not yet have real-world examples to back up those numbers and calculations, but they have to do mathematical modeling and biological logic for why. certain ideas about HIV and the risk of being true.

Acute Infection or HIV Versus PrEP

For example, we do not have research showing that the risk of HIV transmission during PrEP is greater if a partner has acute HIV infection. What's more, a lot of HIV studies are conducted among heterodiscordant heterosexual couples in Africa, and scientists are not 100 percent certain that the results apply to all.

"We know that there is not much certainty in these numbers," says Wilton. But he points out that "they can be a good tool to help people understand the risk and that they just need to be packed with a lot of information."

When we are there, in bed, or in the grass, or in the sand, or in the psychine, the perception changes

Passion is an impractical or functional state of mind!

And for a great primer in understanding health statistics, get your hands on a copy to find out your chances: How to see medical news, advertisements and public service announcements.

Here in Brazil there is none. I say the editor of seropositivo.org, a massive AIDS prevention campaign! It looks like there is no AIDS! As if it didn't exist, with a thousand devils !!!! I freaked out?

During sex, our perception of risk is replaced by love, lust, trust and intimacy.

When you lack information or facts poorly described, you can not understand the true risk of contracting HIV. If you underestimate the prevalence of HIV in your community, you will underestimate the risk. Studies have found that more than one in five homosexual men in urban cities are HIV positive, and the virus is more prevalent among MSM of color and certain communities.

People in these communities are more likely to come into contact with the virus even if they have fewer partners and practice safer sex more often. In other words, the risk of HIV infection is not the same for everyone.

Seronegative? Are you sure? Well, I was just as sure!

Perhaps the biggest miscalculation is the incorrect assessment in which you believe you are HIV negative or your partner is HIV negative. That is why risk reduction strategies like serosorting (having sex without condoms only with people of the same status) have an even greater margin of error.

Perry Halkitis, PhD, a researcher at New York University who has followed cohorts of young MSM and more HIV-positive people, noted that people make assumptions such as: “He's the oldest in town, so he's more likely to be positive and I don't sleep with him. But a young Midwest boy who looks negative? We are sure, we will do everything! ”

The decision process, during the relationship, is practically canceled! The "lust" makes you settle down! Or, as some say: The lust is greater than the fear, even in the days of COVID!

"People are making decisions based on their assessment of the person and they need to be much more focused on the act," says Halkitis, who also believes basic HIV education should go to the nuances of transmission.

He wonders who is going to teach young people not to use Vaseline (oily lubricant when ideally those that are not made on these bases) with condoms, for example, or not for hygienic showers before sex (if you should do it a few hours earlier) ), or if you are photographing the drug, do not share water and vestments in the use of injecting drugs, which can also spread the virus.

Liz DeFrain

Numbers Govern the Universe

Just read about "sacred mathematics". But people don't obey the numbers. At least I prefer to believe that, emphatically disdaining superdeterminism. We make our tomorrow today, just as we did yesterday, ours today.

 

Sexo Oral Não Combina com Gerenciamento de riscosConfused? Yes, but think about it all before the next meeting. And even more so in those horny moments.

The data is doomed. All the numbers in the world do not change the fact that people are reckless (with the forgiveness of the bad word, in step with their risks of contracting HIV. Often for good reason.

Romeo and Juliet Modern? Contaminate me!…

Transiting without a condom can be more risky and devastating than proceeding like this "biker." Because he, at most, can break his neck and take instant death. STDs do not kill quickly.

Whether you are struggling to find a job, a meal or a place to live, HIV is not on your to-do list.

Even if exposure to risk is greater in your daily life, your perception becomes blurred to the reality of the virus.

There was the girl who said:

It contaminates me! “Do you know what that is?” “He's a Third Millennium Romeo and Juliet!

If you are in love or dating, you do not see your partner as a threat, as a "vector" of HIV, despite the fact that up to two-thirds of HIV-positive people spread HIV unknowingly through relationships and this is distributed in a exponentials.

Even on hooks up, people are probably not concerned about tabulating their risk of contracting HIV. A survey asked the young HSM that I interviewed for online sex to list their main concerns.

That the person you met would not have a profile that should be rejected by the person or that they should be stolen or assaulted or raped.

HIV was not the biggest concern.

This is not because young people were ignorant about the virus, says Alex of Columbia University Carballo-Dieguez, PhD, one of the authors of the study along with many other MSM and HIV research.

“In the interview, in the living room sitting across from me, most homosexual men have a greater perception of risk and can accurately recite all the circumstances that can result in HIV transmission,” says Carballo-Dieguez.

“But at the time of the sexual encounter, when men are looking for the most satisfying experience possible, the perception of risk is replaced by love, trust, intimacy, lust and many other condiments that improve the taste of sex.

Using the words of Pascal, [Blaise], Le Coeur to his raisons that la raison ne connait point / the heart has reasons that reason itself does not know

“Our sexual experiences will not be risky or dangerous”! “Our sexual experiences will be magnificent”!

Says Jim Pickett, director of prevention and health advocacy for gay men at the AIDS Foundation in Chicago.

"Sex is connected to pleasure, to intimacy and to things that make us feel good."

And in the real world, risk-takers are celebrated. We have to take risks every day.

"A better approach, he says, is not to ask yourself," What is my HIV risk? "

The risk of contracting HIV is immense if you are a person with constant risky behavior! If you knew my personal story I would think: It took!

But, yes, think about it:

"What can I do to enjoy the sex I want to have but remain disease-free?"

Len Tooley, a colleague of Wilton's at CATIE who also tests for HIV, agrees.

Como ter uma vida sexual boa e saudável?
How to have a good and said sex life? It was a question that I “DIDN'T ASK ME”. I was not interested. The results? Well, see the next photo

Sexual health is often framed in the concept of risk rather than rewards. This can present HIV and those living with it as the worst possible outcome imaginable, he notes that it is not only slanderous but often unreasonable since many people with HIV are indeed just excellent.

"When we get into risk concepts, it's easy to minimize risks," he says.

"When people ask for numbers, they are usually tempted to strike a balance between what they want to do sexually and the chances that these activities would lead to the transmission of the HIV virus." (Risk management)

The discussions that followed, he says, how to ask questions about morals and values ​​around HIV transmission, about how much risk I think is worth taking, how can we perceive HIV as a possible result of our actions and when is it OK2 to abandon condoms. Questions, in other words, that cannot be answered with a simple number.

Bem, para mim, minhas estripulias não foram boas, no final
It is not a recent photo.

March 26, 2014 • By Tr



Get updates right on your device for free

Have something to say? Say it!!! This blog, and the world, is much better with friends!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your feedback data is processed.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More

Privacy & Cookies Policy